Legal Analysis of Law Number 8 Year 2011 Article 10 Paragraph 1 Regarding Final Constitutional Court Decisions

Authors

  • Abi Sugara Fakultas Syariah Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Pontianak

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58355/justices.v2i2.29

Keywords:

Decision, Final, Constitutional Court

Abstract

The Constitutional Court is one of the institutions of judicial power that has the authority to adjudicate cases and also resolve cases from the first level to the last level. the decision has been issued by the constitutional court, the decision has no further legal continuation, that's why the law gives the constitutional court four powers to become one of the institutions that can enforce law and justice in Indonesia and the four powers are: 1) examine UUD 1945 2) decide on an authority dispute between state institutions whose authority has been granted by the state based on the 1945 Constitution 3) decide on the dissolution of political parties 4) decide on disputes over election results, a decision if it has been issued by the constitutional court, the decision is final and also binding so that in this case it causes a positive impact and also a negative impact in the decision, this study has the aim of knowing the meaning and significance of the final decision and what the impact of the decision of the constitutional court which is final and binding, this type of research is juridical normative legal research, namely research with data collection techniques from books, journals or articles and also theses and is equipped with primers from the results of the 1945 Constitution analysis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agus Suwandono, & Deviana Yuanitasari. (2023). Perkembangan Penyalahgunaan Keadaan Sebagai Dasar Pembatalan Perjanjian Dalam Sistem Hukum Perjanjian Di Indonesia. JUSTICES: Journal of Law, 2(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.58355/justices.v2i1.31

Chandranegara, I. S. (2021). Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jakrta timur : Sinar Gravika.

dkk, A. T. (2021). Kesadaran Berkontribusi Bagi Penegak Hukum Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Upaya Kewibawaan Peradilan. Jrnal Konstitusi.

Erma, A. H. (2017). Mencari Keadilan Dan Kebenaran Hukum Progresif Pada Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Renag Pemersatu Bangsa. Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu.

Ida, B. (2020). Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Kepastian Hukum Pemilu. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Johansyah. (2021). Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Bersifat Final Dan Mengikat. 162.

Mulidi, M. A. (2017). Problematika Hukum Putusan Dan Mengikat Mahkamah Konstitusi Presfektif Negara Hukum. Jurnal Hculityukum Ius Qula Lustum F.

Queensly, S. S. (2021). Kompetensi Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Penegakan Hak Asasi Manusi . Lex Administratum.

Thalib, A. R. (2006). Wewenang Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Implikasinya Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya.

Viswandro. (2015). Mengenal Profesi Penegak Hukum. Yogyakarta: Medpress.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-27

How to Cite

Abi Sugara. (2023). Legal Analysis of Law Number 8 Year 2011 Article 10 Paragraph 1 Regarding Final Constitutional Court Decisions. JUSTICES: Journal of Law, 2(2), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.58355/justices.v2i2.29

Issue

Section

Articles