Rules of Procedure for Deciding Disputes on the Constitutional Authority of State Institutions by the Constitutional Court

Sri Wahyuni

doi:10.58355/justices.v2i2.9

Authors

Sri Wahyuni Fakultas Syariah, IAIN Pontianak

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58355/justices.v2i2.9

Keywords:

Procedural Law, Constitutional Court, Disputes Over the Authority of State Institutions.

Abstract

This study aims to describe one of the powers possessed by the Constitutional Court, namely resolving disputes over authority between state institutions. The type of research used is a type of library research (literature), with a normative juridical approach method or doctrinal legal research, namely legal research whose data sources come from secondary data in the form of laws and regulations, books, and journals related to the focus of the problem. Law No. 24 of 2003 on the Constitutional Court does not explain the details of the authority of the Constitutional Court . Therefore, the Court of Justice is empowered to form a regulation to support the smooth performance of its duties and authorities relating to the authority to decide disputes between state institutions. Based on this, PMK No. 08/PMK/2006 on Guidelines for Beracara in Disputes over the Constitutional Authority of State Institutions. When viewed in the formulation of the 1945 Constitution, the institutions that can be both petitioners and respondents in constitutional disputes of state institutions are state institutions whose authority is granted by the 1945 Constitution. The formulation of state institutions whose authority is granted by the 1945 Constitution gives rise to multiple interpretations, thus causing differences in the determination of which state institutions can be parties to the dispute. Regardless, however, determining which state institutions can be parties to constitutional disputes between state institutions remains with the Constitutional Court.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad. (2011). Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Teori dan Praktik.

Akbar, P. (2013). Lembaga-Lembaga Negara Menurut UUD NRI Tahun 1945. Sinar Grafika.

Asshiddiqie, J. (2009). Menuju Negara Hukum Yang Demokratis. PT Bhuana Ilmu Populer Kelompok Gramedia.

Astawa, I. G. P., & Arifin, F. (2021). Sengketa Kewenangan Lembaga Negara di Mahkamah Konstitusi . PT Refika Aditama.

Daulay, I. R. P. (2006). Mahkamah Konstitusi: Memahami Keberadaannya dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Republi Indonesia. PT Rineka Cipta.

Eddyono, L. W. (2019). Progresivitas Putusan Sengketa Kewenangan Lembaga Negara dan Pembaharuan Hukum Acara. Jurnal Konstitusi, 16(1). https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/1617/0

Huda, U. N. (2020). Hukum Lembaga Negara. PT Refika Aditama.

Isra, S. (2020). Lembaga Negara: Konsep, Sejarahm Wewenang, dan Dinamika Konstitusional. PT Rahagrafindo Persada.

Iswandi, K., & Prasetyoningsih, N. (2020). Penyelesaian Sengketa Kewenangan Lembaga Negara Independen di Indonesia. Jurnal SASI, 26(4), 434–446. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v26i4.283&domain=pdf&date_stamp=202

Manggalatung, H. A. S. (2016). Desain Kelembagaan Negara Pasca Amandemen UUD 1945. Gramata Publishing.

Nida Amalia Dewi, & Dedi. (2022). Pendidikan Anti Korupsi Di Perguruan Tinggi Sebagai Upaya Preventif Pencegahan Korupsi. JUSTICES: Journal of Law, 1(1), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.58355/justices.v1i1.3

Noerdajasakti, S. (2015). Hukum Konstitusi: Diskursus Ketatanegaraan Paradigmatis. Intelegnesia Media.

Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 6/PMK/2006 tentang Peroman Beracara dalam Sengketa Kewenangan Konstitusional Lembaga Negara.

Sekertariat Jendral dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2010). Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi . Sekertariat Jendral dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia.

Siahaan, M. (2005). Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia . Konstitusi Press.

Siahaan, M. (2012). Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia (2 ed., Vol. 2). SInar Grafika.

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2004). Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat (Vol. 8). Sinaf Grafika.

Sumadi, A. F. (2013). Politik Hukum, Konstitusi, dan Mahkamah Konstitusi: Aktualisasi Konstitusi dalam Praksis Kenegaraan. Setara Press.

Syawaludin, & Wibowo, A. (2022). Analisis Problematika yangTerjadi pada Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang Bersifat Final dan Mengikat. Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin, 1(2), 103–109. https://journal.pbnsurabaya.co.id

Triningsih, A., & Mardiya, N. Q. (2017). An Analysis of Subjectum Litis and Objectum Litis on Dispute about the Authority of State Institution from the Verdicts of the Constitutional Court. Constitutional Review , 3(2), 232–261.

Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2003 Nomor 4316)

Wianto, N. (t.t.). Sengketa Kewenangan Lembaga Negara. Diambil 16 Desember 2022, dari https://lbhpengayoman.unpar.a.id/sengketa-kewenangan-lembaga-negara/