Jurisprudence of the State Administrative Court in the Development of State Administrative Law

Syawaludin; Arif Wibowo

doi:10.58355/justices.v2i1.18

Authors

Syawaludin Fakultas Syariah IAIN Pontianak
Arif Wibowo Institut Agama Islam Negeri Pontianak

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58355/justices.v2i1.18

Keywords:

State Administrative Court, Access to Justice, Court

Abstract

The State Administrative Court is a judicial body that has absolute authority to examine and resolve disputes in the field of state administration. The development of the jurisprudence of the State Administrative Court (Peratun) is indispensable for the development of state administrative law. The issues studied are the role of jurisprudence in the field of state administrative law and the role of the State Administrative Court in providing access to justice. The method used in this study is library research, namely research whose object of study uses library data in the form of books as a data source. The Supreme Court has made efforts to strengthen jurisprudence so that it can support the development of administrative law. The judge's decision is needed as a source of law. This is because it stems from dynamic legal dispute resolution. Then, jurisprudence can bring social change to society. The judge's decision-making process is also faster than the law-making process. The absolute competence of the wider State Administrative Court can provide easy access to justice where the public can submit complaints about factual actions of the Government in the field of public law. Jurisprudence as a source of law is needed to develop state administrative law by taking into account the development of society, social conditions, legal and political conditions. Jurisprudence produces general principles of good governance so that they can be used to administer government wisely

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bo’a, Fais Yonas. “Pancasila sebagai Sumber Hukum dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional.” Jurnal Konstitusi 15, no. 1 (29 Maret 2018): 21. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1512.

Erwinsyahbana, Tengku, dan Tengku Rizq Frisky Syahbana. “PERSPEKTIF NEGARA HUKUM INDONESIA BERDASARKAN PANCASILA.” Preprint. INA-Rxiv, 5 Februari 2018. https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/cwev7.

Bhakti,Teguh Satya. Pembangunan Hukum Administrasi Negara Melalui Pemberdayaan Yurisprudensi Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Penerbit Alumni, 2022.

Ngutra, Theresia. “HUKUM DAN SUMBER-SUMBER HUKUM,” 2016, 19.

Panjaitan, Oleh Hulman. “KEBERADAAN HUKUM ADAT DALAM YURISPRUDENSI” 2, no. 3 (2016): 8.

Simanjuntak, Enrico. Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara: Transformasi & Refleksi. Sinar Grafika, 2021.

———. “Peran Yurisprudensi dalam Sistem Hukum di Indonesia.” Jurnal Konstitusi 16, no. 1 (1 April 2019): 83–104. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1615.

supandi. “Modernisasi Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Di era Revolusi Industri 4.0 Untuk Mendorong Kemajuan Peradaban Hukum Indonesia.” jurnal hukum pratun, no.2, 2019, 124–49.

Syafawi, Ahmad, Marluwi Marluwi, dan Arif Wibowo. “MEDIASI HAKIM KASUS PERCERAIAN DENGAN ALASAN KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA (KDRT) DI PENGADILAN AGAMA MEMPAWAH KELAS 1B.” Al-Usroh 2, no. 1 (29 Juni 2022): 264–78.

Tri Cahya Indra Permana. “Perihal Kewenangan Penilaian Unsur Penyalahgunaan Wewenang,” in Catatan Kritis Terhadap Perluasan Kewenangan Mengadili Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2016.

Vera, Ni Luh Putu. “LOGIKA HUKUM DAN TEROBOSAN HUKUM MELALUI LEGAL REASONING,” t.t., 13.

Wahyunadi, Yodi Martono. “KOMPETENSI ABSOLUT PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA DALAM KONTEKS UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 30 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG ADMINISTRASI PEMERINTAHAN.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 5, no. 1 (31 Maret 2016): 135–54. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.5.1.2016.135-154.

Weruin, Urbanus Ura. “Logika, Penalaran, dan Argumentasi Hukum.” Jurnal Konstitusi 14, no. 2 (2 November 2017): 374. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1427.

Zamroni, M. “General Principles of Good Governance in Indonesia: What Are The Legal Bases?” Varia Justicia 15, no. 1 (26 Maret 2019): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.31603/variajusticia.v15i1.2464.

Zamzami, Abid, dan Isdiana Kusuma Ayu. “Filosofi Penemuan Hukum Dalam Konstruksi Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 46 P/HUM/2018.” Jurnal Hukum Peratun 2, no. 1 (3 Desember 2019): 75–97. https://doi.org/10.25216/peratun.212019.75-97.