The Role Of The Constitutional Court In Realizing A Democratic Law State Through State Administration In Indonesia

Authors

  • Diantika Chayani Fakultas Syariah Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Pontianak
  • Arif Wibowo Fakultas Syariah Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Pontianak

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58355/justices.v2i3.47

Keywords:

Constitutional Court, law, democracy

Abstract

The Constitutional Court was formed to guarantee the constitution as the highest law so that it can be upheld. The position of the Constitutional Court in the Indonesian constitutional system is as a state institution that carries out a judicial function in the competence of the object of constitutional cases. The existence of the Constitutional Court as guardian of the existing constitution in Indonesia is to strengthen the foundations of constitutionalism in the 1945 constitution with the aim of upholding law and justice. The main authority of the Constitutional Court is to review laws against the 1945 Constitution which is commonly known as judicial review. Another authority of the Constitutional Court, as an effort to structuring the relationship between state institutions and democratic institutions based on the principle of the rule of law. The Constitutional Court is also the interpreter of the constitution which is final and has a function as guardian of the constitution. So the decisions of the Constitutional Court as one of the higher institutions in Indonesia must consider democratic values and the constitutional rights of citizens or human rights (HAM) with the aim of upholding a fair law for all people.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Azhari, A. F. (2005). Kekuasaan Kehakiman Yang Merdeka Dan Bertanggung Jawab Di Mahkamah Konstitusi: Upaya Menemukan Keseimbangan. Jurisprudence, 2(1), 89-118.

Salia, E. (2013). Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Mewujudkan Negara Hukum Yang Demokratis. Jurnal Hukum, 1-24.

Aritonang, D. M. (2013). Peranan Dan Problematika Mahkamah Konstitusi (Mk) Dalan Menjalankan Fungsi Dan Kewenagannya. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi, 10(3), 373-389.

Darmadi, N. S. (2011). Kedudukan Dan Wewenang Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Sistem Hukum Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum, 26(2), 667-690.

Gaffar, J. M. (2009). Kedudukan, Fungsi Dan Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia. Surakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia.

Nurita, R. F. (2015). Kajian Filsafat Hukum Tentang Demokrasi Di Indonesia. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 6(1), 89–98.

Pramana, A. A. (2019). Analisis Kedudukan Dan Wewenang Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Sistem Hukum Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Makasar: Universitas Muhammadiyah Makasar.

Siahaan, M. (2009). Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Penegakan Hukum Konstitusi. Jurnal Hukum, 16(3), 357 - 378.

Sholihah, H. (2018) “PERBANDINGAN HAK-HAK ANAK MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 23 TAHUN 2002 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN ANAK DAN HUKUM ISLAM”, al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies, 1(2), pp. 88–112. doi: 10.31943/afkar_journal.v2i1.21.

Syawaludin, & Arif Wibowo. (2023). Jurisprudence of the State Administrative Court in the Development of State Administrative Law. JUSTICES: Journal of Law, 2(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.58355/justices.v2i1.18

Umi Qalsum. (2023). The Role Of The Indonesian Constitutional Court For Adjudication Of Economic, Social Rights And Effective Culture. JUSTICES: Journal of Law, 2(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.58355/justices.v2i1.32

Yunus, M. (2017). Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian Rancangan Undang-Undang Yang Telah Disetujui Bersama (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Perkara Nomor: 97/PUU-XII/2014). Makassar: Universitas Hasanuddi.

Yusdiyanto. (2016). Makna Filosofis Nilai-Nilai Sila Ke-Empat Pancasila Dalam Sistem Demokrasi Di Indonesia. Jurnal hukum, 10(2), 221-412.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-27

How to Cite

Diantika Chayani, & Arif Wibowo. (2023). The Role Of The Constitutional Court In Realizing A Democratic Law State Through State Administration In Indonesia. JUSTICES: Journal of Law, 2(3), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.58355/justices.v2i3.47

Issue

Section

Articles