Application of Administrative Sanctions in Decisions on State Administrative Cases at the State Administrative Court

Terbit Fajar; Arif Wibowo

doi:10.58355/justices.v2i4.24

Authors

Terbit Fajar IAIN PONTIANAK
Arif Wibowo Institut Agama Islam Negeri Pontianak

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58355/justices.v2i4.24

Keywords:

State Administrative Court, Administrative Sanctions, State Administrative Case Decisions

Abstract

In carrying out its duties and authority, it is felt that the State Administrative Court (PTUN) in Indonesia has not met the expectations of the people seeking justice. This journal discusses the application of administrative sanctions, the obstacles they face and the concept of effective application of administrative sanctions in TUN case decisions at the Semarang PTUN. The research method is socio legal. The results of the research are first, the application of administrative sanctions in TUN case decisions at the Semarang PTUN is not optimal. Second, the obstacles are low awareness of TUN Officials, lack of active participation from the Defendant and lack of supervision, there are no regulations regarding a special budget. Third, the concept of effective implementation is that there is a legal basis for the PTUN to include administrative sanctions in its decision, revise the provisions of the relevant articles, there needs to be a clear commitment from the TUN Agency or Officials and their superiors, the need for supervision.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ayub, & Arif Wibowo. (2023). Optimalisasi Penanganan Pengaduan (Whistleblowing System) Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Menuju Tata Kelola Pemerintahan Yang Baik. JUSTICES: Journal of Law, 2(1), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.58355/justices.v2i1.6

Diantika Chayani. (2023). Existence of State Administrative Court in Resolving Disputes. JUSTICES: Journal of Law, 2(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.58355/justices.v2i2.50

Fahmal, H. A. Muin. (2008). Peran Asas-asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Layak Dalam Mewujudkan Pemerintahan Yang Bersih. Yogyakarta : Penerbit Kreasi Total Media

Rahardjo, S. (1980). Hukum dan Masyarakat. Bandung : Angkasa

Rimdan. (2012). Kekuasaan Kehakiman Pasca Amandemen Konstitusi. Jakarta : Kencana Pramdena Grup.

Soekanto, S. (2001). Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta : Raja Gravindo Persada

Sugiyono. (2009). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sri Wahyuni, & Arif Wibowo. (2023). Authority, Subject and Object of the Dispute At the State Administrative Court (PTUN). JUSTICES: Journal of Law, 2(1), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.58355/justices.v2i1.8

Sofi Yuliniar. (2023). Principles of State Administrative Court In Indonesia. JUSTICES: Journal of Law, 2(2), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.58355/justices.v2i2.27

Suteki. (2013). Hukum dan Alih Teknologi : Suatu Tinjauan Sosiologis. Jogjakarta : Thafa Media.